I am a self-proclaimed Jane Austen addict. A recent conversation led me to realize that I actually don’t know that much about the woman herself apart from her wonderful novels. What I do know is shamefully from the movie Becoming Jane, which I think is partially accurate. Then again, Hollywood does strive to add a small dose of truth to their biopics. I became uneasy though when I realized just how little that amount of truth may have been. So I took to the internet to research my favorite authoress!
For one thing, Jane Austen was born in 1775. December 16th, to be exact. For a little context, thats just a year before the United States Declaration of Independence was codified! What an amazing period of history to be brought into the world. It baffles me sometimes to think about what amazingly different histories were occurring simultaneously in countries like England and the US. I mean, a country was being born around the same time another country was starting another chapter in its already overwhelmingly long history. Okay, tangent over.
So Jane Austen was born into the world in 1775 to an already rather large family. She had six brothers and one sister. According to websites like wikipedia (I know, not incredibly reliable but I think I’m relatively safe on this subject), Jane and her sister Cassandra were extremely close. Wiki also reports that Jane and her brother Henry Thomas were really close, and that he wound up being the one to help her get published later in life. So at least that part of Becoming Jane was moderately accurate. Neither Jane nor Cassandra ever married, and wikipedia doesn’t really have a lot to say about the reasons. I guess a lot of Jane’s history is not known. Her brother George was apparently sent away to live with a local family at a young age because he was “mentally abnormal and subject to fits.” Two of her brothers became admirals in the navy, and her brother Edward was adopted by a fourth cousin, Thomas Knight. Sounds like the family didn’t really get to stay together. I wonder if families were normally that large back then? From some of her novels it seems like it was a common practice for larger families to send their children away to distant relatives. (I’m thinking of Mansfield Park specifically at the moment).
I’m not going to go into a lot of other details of her life, because you can all look at wikipedia. Something else that I’d been considering though was what period of time she lived in. It seems that she lived in several. Most of the movies I’ve seen that recreate her novels describe themselves as “regency-era” England. So of course I looked that up. Turns out that “Strictly speaking, the Regency is the period 1811-1820 when King George III was declared incapacitated (due to insanity), and the Prince of Wales (later George IV) acted as Regent.” Muy interesante en mi opinion. The thing is, it would appear that Jane Austen defies classification. She can be labeled as “18th Century” or “Romantic” or “Victorian” but doesn’t totally fit in any of those categories. Jane was not inspired by romanticism, and therefore can’t really be classified as a “romantic” author even though many of her stories have inspired my own romantic notions. The regency period seems like the best fit, even though it didn’t start til 1811 and Jane died in 1817. Still, that was around when she began publishing I guess.
Not a bad thing to defy classification.
The more I learn about Jane, the more fascinating she becomes to me. I obviously haven’t shared a lot of what I learned about her because I refuse to be the captain of redundancy. You are clearly connected to the internet if reading this and are capable of doing your own research if you want the full details of Ms. Jane’s life.
How can a woman who defies her own time period not be interesting?